Osteoporosis involves a progressive
loss of bone calcium, which weakens bones especially in post-menopausal
women, and also in men beginning around age 65. One third of women
over 65 will have fractures. By age 90, 17% of men will fracture
their hips. More than 10 million
Americans, mostly women, already have osteoporosis.
"[To prevent bone loss,] topping every list, of course, are good
health habits: regular weight bearing exercise (such as walking,
running, or weight training), an adequate intake of calcium (1,500
mg a day for postmenopausal women) and vitamin D"
Univ. Of California-Berkeley Wellness Newsletter 14: 1 (June,
1998)
- What to do when you are young
Osteoporosis affects millions of Americans.
It is estimated to cause 1.3 million fractures annually to people
over 45 in the U.S. What actions can a person take to reduce the
risk of developing osteoporosis?
A review of the literature shows
that the usefulness of calcium intake to increase bone mass and
decrease osteoporosis is highly controversial, while many other
factors are clear.
"Behavior of young adults has a major impact on the chance of
developing osteoporosis later in life. Risk of osteoporosis depends
on peak bone mass which develops when young. Exercise reduces
the risk for osteoporosis by increasing bone mass."
Nelson M: The Effects of Exercise on Bone Health and Body Composition.
AGE, 16:182, 1993
"Dietary factors are significant. High protein intake may cause
excretion of calcium, and the high amount of protein in most American's
diets is probably a major cause of osteoporosis."
Holl MG, Allen LH: Comparative effects of meals high in protein,
sucrose, or starch on human mineral metabolism and insulin secretion.
Am J Clin Nutr, 48:1219-25, 1988;
"High sodium intake also leads to loss of calcium."
Itoh R, Suyama Y: Sodium excretion in relation to calcium and
hydroxproline excretion in a healthy Japanese population. Am J
Clin Nutr, 63:735-40, 1996
- Calcium
supplements are controversial
The last RDA for calcium was 800-1,200 mg per day, but the recent
consensus conference of the National Institutes of Health increased
the recommendation to 1,000-1,500 mg daily (NIH Panel urges
increase in adult calcium intake. Pub Health Repts, 109:715-6,
1994). But though most people agree on the need for calcium
in the diet, the debate on the value of calcium supplementation
continues, even as the daily requirement for calcium has increased.
When I sought good reviews about the value of calcium supplements,
I was surprised to find two reviews, published at nearly the same
time, in the same distinguished journal, reviewing the same data,
and reaching opposite conclusions. Anyone who tells you there
is one obvious correct answer is blind to the controversial reality
of calcium supplements.
Nordin, B. E. and Heaney, R. P., "Calcium Supplementation Of
The Diet: Justified By The Present Evidence", British Medical
Journal 300:1056-60 (1990)
Kanis, J. A., and Passmore, R., "Calcium Supplementation Of The
Diet: Not Justified By The Present Evidence", British Medical
Journal 298:137-40 (1989)
Two factors are important to consider in this debate. In favor
of supplementation, it is well established from dietary surveys
such as those presented in the RDA report that most of the U.S.
population does not obtain sufficient calcium from the diet. On
the other hand, calcium supplements with high dosages may be hazardous,
cause unpleasant side effects, and not be effectively absorbed.
Evidence
against calcium supplements
Too much calcium is dangerous to your
health
Except for young men, most of us get less calcium in the diet
than the RDA. But there are many exceptions, especially among
supplement users, and few people seem to realize that too much
calcium may be as harmful as too little.
"10% of the adult population reports calcium intakes already
exceeding 1000 (women) and 1400 (men) mg/day." "Adverse effects
of high-calcium diets may occur at intakes greater than 2000 mg/day."
"Very high intakes of calcium have been reported to cause osteochondrosis,
renal failure, and death...soft tissue calcification, irritability,
headache, ...risk of kidney stone formation"
Whiting, S. J. and Wood, R. J., "Adverse Effects of High-calcium
Diets in humans", Nutr. Rev. 55: 1-9 (1997)
Calcium
supplements interfere with absorption of zinc.
Another serious risk associated with calcium is that calcium
in supplement form may interfere with zinc uptake from the intestine,
leading to zinc deficiency. Anyone taking calcium supplements
should take an appropriate amount of zinc at the same time.
"Our findings suggest that high-calcium diets [or supplements]
can reduce net zinc absorption and balance and may increase the
zinc requirement in adult humans." "Zinc deficiency has many untoward
effects, including loss of appetite, growth retardation, skin
changes, and immunologic abnormalities."
Wood, R.J., and Zheng, J.J., "High dietary calcium intakes reduce
zinc absorption and balance in humans", Am J Clin Nutr. 65: 1803-
9 (1997)
This interference has been quantitated, so that one can properly
blend the correct amount of calcium and zinc in a supplement,
though few calcium supplements do this.
"researchers found that in women and men who took a 600-mg calcium
pill with a meal containing about 7 mg of zinc, zinc absorption
was reduced by 50%. However, adding about 8 mg of zinc to the
calcium supplement offset the decline."
Harvard Women's Health Watch 5 (Jan, 98), In "Zooming in on zinc",
pg 6
On the other hand, the answer is not to go out and buy a zinc
supplement to go with your calcium supplement, for zinc supplements
too have hazards.
"Zinc supplements of 50 mg per day can cause a decrease in the
important enzyme superoxide dismutase. Excessive intakes of zinc
have also caused low levels of high- density lipoproteins, increasing
the effects of low-density lipoproteins that in theory contribute
to atherosclerosis and heart disease."
Harvard Women's Health Watch 5 (Jan, 98), In "Zooming in on zinc",
pg 6
The RDA for zinc is 12 mg, but most women get less than 10, with
elderly getting about 9. Note the ratio in the previous report
indicates about 8 mg of zinc compensates for about 600 mg calcium.
Review of the available studies attempting to quantitate this
relationship and interference have led me to the conclusion that
about 2 mg of zinc should be taken for each 100 mg of supplemental
calcium, as long as you never take too much calcium at once. So
how much should one take? Any at all?
Evidence
for calcium supplements
We are not drinking milk like we used to, and that decreases
calcium consumption. Some believe that this contributes to osteoporosis,
although there are others who believe that the high protein content
of milk is likely to contribute to osteoporosis, because the protein
in milk may leach calcium from bone. I have spoken with researchers
who believe that this is another highly politicized area of research,
with the milk lobby supporting the message that milk reduces the
risk of osteoporosis.
"One possible problem is that dairy products are rich in protein,
and a high protein intake slightly increases calcium excretion
in urine, which might reduce bone density."
Univ. Of California-Berkeley Wellness Newsletter 15: 10 (July,
1999)
"Per capita milk consumption in the United States has declined
every year for the past 20 years" "at least one-third of all osteoporotic
fractures have a nutritional basis...pill-takers maintained a
significantly elevated calcium intake."
Heaney, R.P., "Food: what a surprise!", Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64:791-2
(1996)
Although the recommended daily allowance is 1,000 mg for young
men and women, and 1,500 mg daily for post-menopausal women and
older men, the daily intake is substantially less. Reported by
the U.S. Bureau of the Census (Statistical Abstracts Of The
United States: 1995 (115th ed). Washington, DC, US Government
Printing Office, 1995, pg. 146.), young women consume an average
of 600 mg daily, and the recommended daily intake is 1,000 mg,
a difference of 400 mg. For post-menopausal women, the average
intake is 700 mg daily, the requirement 1,500 mg, so mature women
fall 800 mg short per day. Young men generally consume as much
calcium as the RDA suggests, and thus are unlikely to benefit,
and may be harmed, by supplemental calcium. However for mature
men, over the age of about 60, their metabolism changes too, and
they begin to lose calcium, with senior men suffering osteoporosis
just as women do. For this reason, supplemental calcium is also
warranted for mature men.
But is calcium intake really important
to prevent osteoporosis? The jury is very much out on that subject,
and reports vary widely. It is clear that many factors are involved
- calcium intake helps perhaps, exercise definitely helps build
strong bones, while smoking and high intakes of alcohol,
protein, and phosphate all leach out calcium from our bones. Most
soft drinks are loaded with phosphates (as well as sugar), and
the rise in soft drink consumption may well be connected to the
rise in osteoporosis.
The basic process of bone maintenance is known as remodeling.
The calcium in our bones turns over on a regular basis throughout
life. To maintain the strength of our bones, small divots are
continually forming in bone, sites at which the calcium is removed.
Then the divot is refilled with fresh calcium. Bone is remodeled
at a rate of 5% per year. Remodeling is important to eliminate
wear and tear. This remodeling occurs in 3 months in youth, and
over 9-12 months in the elderly. Initial bone mass depends 80%
on heredity, 20% on exercise at age 10, but after age 50, depends
60% on heredity and 40% on lifestyle, esp. calcium, exercise,
weight, smoking, and alcohol consumption.
Buring, J.E., Gaziano, M. and Hennekens, C.H., "Antioxidant Supplementation
On Aging And Related Diseases", AGE 23rd Annual Meeting, pg. 5
(1993)
But some studies do suggest that supplements can help as we age.
"In women within the first 5 years after menopause, supplemental
calcium does not reduce the rate of bone loss. Women beyond this
age are more responsive to supplemental calcium, particularly
if they have low usual dietary calcium intakes. ..Recent estimates
of the calcium requirement range from 800 to 1,500 mg daily."
Dawson-Hughes, B., "Calcium and Vitamin D Nutrition and Aging",
AGE 23rd Annual Meeting, pg. 6 (1993); also Dawson-Hughes, B.,
et al, "Calcium retention and hormone levels in black and white
women on high- and low- calcium diets", J Bone and Mineral Res.
8: 779-87 (1993)
- My
research gives a safe, proven dosage
MY ANSWER: OUR STUDIES INDICATE 200 MG TWICE A DAY FOR YOUNG
WOMEN; 400 MG TWICE A DAY FOR MATURE MEN AND WOMEN
After using the method of urinary excretion to determine a saturating
dosage of vitamin C, my students and I conducted a similar study
to determine a useful dosage of calcium (submitted to Journal
of the American Aging Association). Previous studies have established
that urinary excretion is proportional to intestinal absorption
of calcium.
Kesteloot J, Joossens JV: The relationship between dietary intake
and urinary excretion of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium.
J Human Hypertension, 4:527-533, 1990; Brink EJ, van Beresteijn
ECH, Dekker PR: Urinary excretion of magnesium and calcium as
an index of absorption is not affected by lactose intake in healthy
adults. Brit J Nutr, 69:863-870, 1993
So we measured the rate of excretion
of calcium in the urine. One group of pre-menopausal women and
another of post-menopausal women were given different dosages
of calcium to determine how much
was effectively absorbed. Remember calcium is continually being
excreted in the urine, even when there is no calcium in the diet,
due to remodeling of bone. The figure below compares a woman getting
no calcium and taking calcium supplements. Note that when taking
300 mg twice a day, she is always excreting more than when not
taking the supplement. This reflects that she is absorbing the
supplemental dosage.
Over how long is the supplement absorbed?
Figure
34
shows the rate of calcium excretion
in response to increasing dosages of calcium. The important thing
to note is that the curves rise over the first 6-12 hours, and
then go down. Just as we found with vitamin C, calcium is absorbed
and excreted over a 12 hour period. We need to take calcium twice
a day.
What about dosage? How much do we effectively absorb? I became
interested in this because my mother was suffering from osteoporosis.
She went to her physician and asked, "How much calcium should
I take?" His response was "Take a lot." "How much is a lot?",
she asked. "I don't know," he replied, "just take a lot." Amazingly,
no studies had been done to determine how much is effectively
absorbed. With all the calcium supplements in the marketplace,
no one had studied whether they were absorbed. Below is a sample
of our surprising results.
Pre- menopausal women showed the greatest
absorption when given 250 mg twice daily
(Fig. 33). Note that higher
dosages did not lead to greater excretion or absorption. The extra
calcium in the dose comes out in feces, leading to side effects
like diarrhea. A follow-up study showed that actually only 200
mg are necessary. By the way,
the Berkeley Wellness Newsletter now advises all women to take
their calcium supplements twice
a day. Current evidence indicates
the most effective absorption occurs with the nighttime dose.
Figure
33:
250 mg calcium is absorbed by pre-menopausal
women
Figure
34: Calcium is absorbed over 12 hours
Figure
35: 300 mg twice a day is absorbed by pre-menopausal women
Post- menopausal women, with substantial variability depending
on medications like Fosimax or estrogen, showed an average maximal
absorption at a 400 mg dose twice daily. These dosages are substantially
lower than many calcium supplements presently on the market, and
are less likely to lead to unpleasant side effects like diarrhea.
What was striking was that these amounts
are consistent with the difference between the average dietary
intake, determined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (Statistical
Abstracts Of The United States: 1995 (115th ed). Washington, DC,
US Government Printing Office, 1995, pg. 146.)
and the NIH recommended dosages. Young women consume an average
of 600 mg daily, and the recommended daily intake is 1,000 mg,
a difference of 400 mg or 200 mg twice a day. For post- menopausal
women, the average intake is 700 mg daily, the requirement 1,500
mg, and so a supplemental 400 mg twice a day provides the necessary
800 difference.
Figure 36: Daily requirement for calcium
| |
Average Intake |
Daily Value |
Supplemental Need |
|
Young women |
600 mg |
1,000 mg |
400 mg = 200 mg x2 |
|
Young men |
1,000 mg |
1,000 mg |
0 |
|
Post-menopausal women |
700 mg |
1,500 mg |
800 mg =400 mg x2 |
|
Men over 60 |
700 mg |
1,500 mg |
800 mg =400 mg x2 |
What about men? Young men consume as much calcium as the RDA
suggests, and thus are unlikely to benefit, and may be harmed,
by supplemental calcium. However for mature men, over the age
of about 60, their metabolism changes too, and they begin to lose
calcium, with senior men suffering osteoporosis just as women
do. For this reason, supplemental calcium is also warranted for
mature men. Based on the 1,500 mg requirement and 700 mg daily
intake, a dosage similar to that of post-menopausal women, 400
mg twice a day, is warranted.
As a final note on calcium, there is a possibility that calcium
also may protect the colon from cancer:
"intake of calcium from foods and supplements [in mature men]
was inversely associated with colon cancer risk"
Kearney, J, Giovannucci, E., Rimm, EB, Ascherio, A, Stampfer,
MJ, Colditz, GA, Wing, A, Kampman, E. and Willett, WC. "Calcium,
vitamin D, and dairy foods and the occurrence of colon cancer
in men", Am. J. Epidemiol. 143(9): 907-17, (1996).
In summary, adequate intake of calcium is likely to reduce the
risk of osteoporosis, and may provide protection from colon cancer
as well. However, high dosages of calcium, as found in many existing
calcium supplements, may cause unpleasant side effects and long
term health risks. For calcium, too much intake may be as hazardous
as too little. Our studies show that young women should get 200
mg of supplemental calcium twice a day. Mature men and women should
take 400 mg twice a day.
- How
much vitamin D should you take?
Since 2000, it has been discovered that we need lots of vitamin D, much more than most people get sunbathing. It requires 30 minutes in shorts and a T shirt without sunscreen in June in Wisconsin just to get 400 IU. And the top vitamin D authorities now realize young people need 1,000 IU daily, people over 65 need 2,000 IU daily for strong bones, and to prevent various forms of cancer. Everyone is likely to benefit by taking at least 1,000 IU of vitamin D daily. Search the web site for the latest findings.
The
case for vitamin D supplements
"For all women and men over 65, daily intake [of calcium] is
recommended to be 1,500 mg/day... In men and women 65 years of
age and older, calcium intake of less than 600 mg/day is common...
vitamin D insufficiency has been detected and may contribute to
reduced calcium absorption... The physiology of calcium homeostasis
in aging men over 65 is similar to that of women..."
NIH, Optimal calcium intake, NIH Consensus Statement 12: 1-31
(1994)
As the above quotation indicates, there are some individuals
who do not get even 600 IU of vitamin D daily. If we all need at least 1,000 IU, and 2,000 IU is okay, then taking a supplement is important.